Pop Theory 21: On the Election: Binders, Binders Everywhere

  • The service having id "propeller" is missing, reactivate its module or save again the list of services.
  • The service having id "buzz" is missing, reactivate its module or save again the list of services.
Pop Theory 21: On the Election: Binders, Binders Everywhere

issues as bandages for larger societal ills (like universal healthcare and US militaristic imperialism), are not being accounted for in this election. We have no binder, or, better put, the candidates really don’t give a shit about us. Why? We have no political currency. The “pink dollar” is held in the hands of white gay men, who, ironically, comprise the smallest percentage of out LGBTs. Perennial gay white dude Joe Salmonese, the former head of the HRC, is co-Chair of Obama’s re-election campaign.

Black lesbians, nota bene, make up the largest percentage of our “out” community. What kind of political power do they hold when neither candidate will even mention increasing the minimum wage? When it’s open season on affirmative action? (The white woman is the perfect conservative pawn.) In the second debate, Romney subverted revealing his opinion about equal pay for women with the now notorious “binders full of women” anecdote. Obama spoke of signing the Lily Ledbetter act, which allows women to sue for equal pay—but this piece of legislation should in no way be construed as legislation mandating equal pay. No ladies, you must sue for it.

Ah, America.

Queer people, again, as I noted in my previous column, are substantially poorer than our hetero-counterparts. This means our political gravitas is, well, anything but deep. I don’t have a pragmatic solution for this issue unless patriarchy and all its shitty ramifications magically disappear. Sorry, people.

But I can say this: think carefully about who you plan to vote for this election. Voting is our right. Try not to be a single-issue voter. For instance, if you’re a proponent of the food movement, you probably know that this movement encapsulates a handful of issues: from animal rights and environmental conservation to fair trade practices and corporate regulation. And don’t let anyone pressure you into voting one way or the other, or the other. If you want to vote for a third party candidate—say, the Green Party’s Dr. Jill Stein—don’t let anyone convince you that you’re “throwing away” your vote or that your vote help’s the ideologically worse candidate. A vote for Jill Stein, for instance, is not a vote for Romney—this faulty line of thinking presumes that had you not voted for Stein that you would have automatically voted for Obama.

Vote early, and vote often (!). And, if you’re voting by absentee ballot, send in that shit ASAP!

What issues / values determine how you vote?